critique motivation - discuss!

[Orsen Wells w/Citizen Cain]

<...>

Barbara's Cat
Meat Plow
Rik
ggamble

Post editing so early in one of your "discussions," Peter? You'll
have to learn more patience, if you want to keep fooling casual
readers like Gwyneth into thinking they're meant to be actual
"discussions" and not just more trolling from you.

Do, please, explain what makes me a "casual reader", George.
g.

Well, actually, Gwyneth, I've got no evidence that you've read
anything on aapc in the last couple of years.

If Gwyneth has, then it wasn't very carefully.

With Gwyneth's glowing defense of ggamble, she obviously has missed
the bulk of his worthless spew over the last several years, not to
mention his vicious, misogynistic attacks on poets, most notably the
elderly female poet Vera Lexi, who eventually simply vanished from the
newsgroups, or his real life stalking of Doris Cline (Kline?), who he
posted personal information (without permission or credit to the
writer) about that he found on the internet and brought here.

BTW, both of these examples can easily be found in the archives, and
reposted here if you missed them in your casual and selective reading
of ggamble's posts here, Gwyneth... I'm certain most of the other
readers have seen such examples of ggamble's "generosity" often enough
to be glad ass happy to not bother with it.

If the "post proof" rule is brought in, of course, then this can be
done immediately... dozens of examples, in fact.

If you think it's important to discuss what kind of "reader," you are,
why not just say what kind of "reader" you think you are?

A misinformed reader? A hypocritical reader? I hope for better, but
Usenet does seem to bring out the worst in people sometimes.

I look forward to Gwyneth's reply to this, of course, rather than
second guess her motives for trying to defend the spews of a dishonest
gasfly like Gary Gamble.


Duckery none of that made a god damn bit of sense and you should be ashamed
of yourself for posting such drivel.

[Orsen Wells w/Citizen Cain]

<...>
Do you have anything to say about whether the act of writing a
critique is selfish or generous?
If not, why are you posting in this thread?
Why don't you try posting a poem or a critique instead?
Perhaps you're incapable?

ok-
roses are red
violets are blue
peter j ross
is better than you.
oh,
and fuck off!

And you wonder why some people doubt
the validity of your claim of being
forty years old.
Physically, you possibly could be.
Mentally, you are not even close.

Well shit, Duckery is in his *50s* and *he* acts like a four-year-old who
just drank a can of Mountain Dew.