Live Your Dreams!

[Barbara's Cat]

How would you know whether they're poems or not?

Because she "said" they were poems.

I "said" you are a quacking duck;
therefore, you are a quacking duck.

Hey, it's your "logic", not mine.

(Note the apostrophe in "it's".)

[Barbara's Cat]

Post by Barbara's Cat

How would you know whether they're poems or not?

Because she "said" they were poems.

I "said" you are a quacking duck;
therefore, you are a quacking duck.
Hey, it's your "logic", not mine.
(Note the apostrophe in "it's".)

QUACK

Exactly.

[Barbara's Cat]

Post by Barbara's Cat

How would you know whether they're poems or not?

Because she "said" they were poems.

I "said" you are a quacking duck;
therefore, you are a quacking duck.
Hey, it's your "logic", not mine.
(Note the apostrophe in "it's".)

QUACK

Is that Duckerish for "Know of a good link
that explores such apostrophe problems?"

[Barbara's Cat]

Post by Barbara's Cat

How would you know whether they're poems or not?

Because she "said" they were poems.

I "said" you are a quacking duck;
therefore, you are a quacking duck.
Hey, it's your "logic", not mine.
(Note the apostrophe in "it's".)

QUACK!

IOW, because Classics Illustrated never published a comic book
that explained the difference between "its" and "it's", you're
(not your or yore) forever screwed from knowing the difference,
eh, Goober?

[Barbara's Cat]

Post by Barbara's Cat

How would you know whether they're poems or not?

Because she "said" they were poems.

I "said" you are a quacking duck;
therefore, you are a quacking duck.
Hey, it's your "logic", not mine.
(Note the apostrophe in "it's".)

QUACK!

Your (not you're or yore) proving me correct
about you being a quacking duck isn't (Oops!
That nasty apostrophe is just going to cause
even more quacking from you, isn't it, Duck?)
necessary because everyone already knows I'm
(Damn it! Another apostrophe for you to quack
about. Life is a bitch, isn't it?) correct.

[Barbara's Cat]

Post by Barbara's Cat

How would you know whether they're poems or not?

Because she "said" they were poems.

I "said" you are a quacking duck;
therefore, you are a quacking duck.
Hey, it's your "logic", not mine.
(Note the apostrophe in "it's".)

QUACK!

You are, no matter how minute (pronounced /my-noot/)
the bread crumb placed before you, forcefully driven
by your ducky instincts to quack at it, eh, Goober?

So hard driven. So compelled to quack. So Dockery.

(Look, Duck! I did not use any apostrophes! Not one.
That was rather good-old-boy sympathetic of me, eh?)

[Barbara's Cat]

Post by Barbara's Cat

How would you know whether they're poems or not?

Because she "said" they were poems.

I "said" you are a quacking duck;
therefore, you are a quacking duck.
Hey, it's your "logic", not mine.
(Note the apostrophe in "it's".)

QUACK!

Do you also quack while you are asleep? Knowing that you,
like chuckles, exist [sic] so very alone in your pathetic
ducky world, you will need to use a tape (Oh! If you could
only afford to purchase the electronic type, eh?) recorder
to record yourself while you sleep to ever find out whether
you do or do not quack while you are asleep. I am betting
in vain on the "do" (in vain because no sane person would
ever counter such a no-chance-of-losing-this-one bet).

BTW, have you yet found a good link for a web site that
explores that nasty apostrophe problem that haunts you?
If not, try asking an elementary school teacher about it.
If they refuse to talk to you (which is highly likely),
remember the old saying: Google is your friend.

No apostrophes were used in this post. No thanks required.

[Barbara's Cat]

Post by Barbara's Cat

How would you know whether they're poems or not?

Because she "said" they were poems.

I "said" you are a quacking duck;
therefore, you are a quacking duck.
Hey, it's your "logic", not mine.
(Note the apostrophe in "it's".)

QUACK!?

It is unquestionable that you, as you have constantly
and consistently demonstrated, are a quacking duck.
Most anyone can post a message (translate as "throwing
bread crumbs") and you will eagerly waddle up Mach 2,
clamp onto it with your big yellow mouth (which matches
the color of your little yellow spine), and duckerishly
quack at it, e.g., Message-IDs of bread crumbs thrown:

<9a23893a-d42f-436e-9fb2-***@21g2000hsj.googlegroups.com>
<184fe851-b7ec-45db-8d2f-***@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
<f84bf4ad-7bcf-4f3b-923f-***@m77g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
<82f36818-bfaa-44b1-b743-***@d70g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
<614c7fd7-af65-432e-998b-***@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
<69bf8a8d-a7a7-4a03-ab7f-***@f47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>

"Pathetic" would truly be an understatement, eh, Goober?

So eager for bread crumbs. So quacking duck. So Dockery.

(Again, no apostrophes. Very duckitarian of me, eh?)

[Barbara's Cat]

Post by Barbara's Cat

Post by Barbara's Cat

How would you know whether they're poems or not?

Because she "said" they were poems.

I "said" you are a quacking duck;
therefore, you are a quacking duck.
Hey, it's your "logic", not mine.
(Note the apostrophe in "it's".)

QUACK!?

It is unquestionable that you, as you have constantly
and consistently demonstrated, are a quacking duck.
Most anyone can post a message (translate as "throwing
bread crumbs") and you will eagerly waddle up Mach 2,
clamp onto it with your big yellow mouth (which matches
the color of your little yellow spine), and duckerishly
"Pathetic" would truly be an understatement, eh, Goober?
So eager for bread crumbs. So quacking duck. So Dockery.
(Again, no apostrophes. Very duckitarian of me, eh?)

QUACK!!!

Thirteen minutes? It took you thirteen minutes to come
waddling and quacking for the bread crumbs I threw you.
What is the problem, Duck? The accumulated yellow fat
in your quacking-duck ass slowing you down today? But,
hey, Goober, at least you got here to do your ever so
predictable quacking, right?

So eager for bread crumbs. So quacking duck. So Dockery.

(Look! No apostrophes again! Nice, eh, Goober?)

[Dennis M. Hammes]

Post by Barbara's Cat
Very duckitarian of me, eh?

Silly. You could have had a V-8.

[Barbara's Cat]

Post by Dennis M. Hammes

Post by Barbara's Cat
Very duckitarian of me, eh?

Silly. You could have had a V-8.

And a liverwurst sandwich
with a thick slice of onion
and some spicy brown mustard
on Wonder brand white bread.

And I will cut its crust off
to make bread crumbs for Duck.
It's the duckitarian thing to do--
without bread crumbs, he will die.

[Barbara's Cat]

Post by Barbara's Cat

Post by Dennis M. Hammes

Post by Barbara's Cat
Very duckitarian of me, eh?

Silly. You could have had a V-8.

And a liverwurst sandwich
with a thick slice of onion
and some spicy brown mustard
on Wonder brand white bread.
And I will cut its crust off
to make bread crumbs for Duck.
It's the duckitarian thing to do--
without bread crumbs, he will die.

QUACK!

As expected, Goober comes waddling up on cue.


So predictable. So quacking duck. So Dockery.

[Barbara's Cat]

Post by Barbara's Cat

Post by Barbara's Cat

Post by Dennis M. Hammes

Post by Barbara's Cat
Very duckitarian of me, eh?

Silly. You could have had a V-8.

And a liverwurst sandwich
with a thick slice of onion
and some spicy brown mustard
on Wonder brand white bread.
And I will cut its crust off
to make bread crumbs for Duck.
It's the duckitarian thing to do--
without bread crumbs, he will die.

QUACK!

As expected, Goober comes waddling up on cue.
So predictable. So quacking duck. So Dockery.

QUACK!

As always, without fail, Goober quacks again!

So predictable. So quacking duck. So Dockery.

[Dennis M. Hammes]

Post by Barbara's Cat

Post by Barbara's Cat

Post by Dennis M. Hammes

Post by Barbara's Cat
Very duckitarian of me, eh?

Silly. You could have had a V-8.

And a liverwurst sandwich
with a thick slice of onion
and some spicy brown mustard
on Wonder brand white bread.
And I will cut its crust off
to make bread crumbs for Duck.
It's the duckitarian thing to do--
without bread crumbs, he will die.

QUACK!

As expected, Goober comes waddling up on cue.

Whaddaya speck?
You drop good crumbs.

Post by Barbara's Cat
So predictable. So quacking duck. So Dockery.

[Dennis M. Hammes]

Post by Barbara's Cat

Post by Dennis M. Hammes

Post by Barbara's Cat
Very duckitarian of me, eh?

Silly. You could have had a V-8.

And a liverwurst sandwich
with a thick slice of onion
and some spicy brown mustard
on Wonder brand white bread.
And I will cut its crust off
to make bread crumbs for Duck.
It's the duckitarian thing to do--
without bread crumbs, he will die.

On the Invention of Pressed Duck

Why did the Duck cross the road?

That's the direction he happened
to be facing when he got drunk
enough to stagger out into traffic.

[Barbara's Cat]

Post by Dennis M. Hammes

Post by Barbara's Cat

Post by Dennis M. Hammes

Post by Barbara's Cat
Very duckitarian of me, eh?

Silly. You could have had a V-8.

And a liverwurst sandwich
with a thick slice of onion
and some spicy brown mustard
on Wonder brand white bread.
And I will cut its crust off
to make bread crumbs for Duck.
It's the duckitarian thing to do--
without bread crumbs, he will die.

On the Invention of Pressed Duck
Why did the Duck cross the road?
That's the direction he happened
to be facing when he got drunk
enough to stagger out into traffic.

Q: What is the difference between
a large pizza and Will Dockery?

A: A large pizza can feed a family.

[Dennis M. Hammes]

Post by Barbara's Cat

Post by Dennis M. Hammes

Post by Barbara's Cat

Post by Dennis M. Hammes

Post by Barbara's Cat
Very duckitarian of me, eh?

Silly. You could have had a V-8.

And a liverwurst sandwich
with a thick slice of onion
and some spicy brown mustard
on Wonder brand white bread.
And I will cut its crust off
to make bread crumbs for Duck.
It's the duckitarian thing to do--
without bread crumbs, he will die.

On the Invention of Pressed Duck
Why did the Duck cross the road?
That's the direction he happened
to be facing when he got drunk
enough to stagger out into traffic.

Q: What is the difference between
a large pizza and Will Dockery?
A: A large pizza can feed a family.

Hey. That's the Pressed Duck.
Ergo, so can Dockery.
(Once...)

[Barbara's Cat]

Post by Barbara's Cat

Post by Barbara's Cat

Post by Barbara's Cat

How would you know whether they're poems or not?

Because she "said" they were poems.

I "said" you are a quacking duck;
therefore, you are a quacking duck.
Hey, it's your "logic", not mine.
(Note the apostrophe in "it's".)

QUACK!?

It is unquestionable that you, as you have constantly
and consistently demonstrated, are a quacking duck.
Most anyone can post a message (translate as "throwing
bread crumbs") and you will eagerly waddle up Mach 2,
clamp onto it with your big yellow mouth (which matches
the color of your little yellow spine), and duckerishly
"Pathetic" would truly be an understatement, eh, Goober?
So eager for bread crumbs. So quacking duck. So Dockery.
(Again, no apostrophes. Very duckitarian of me, eh?)

QUACK!!!

Thirteen minutes? It took you thirteen minutes to come
waddling and quacking for the bread crumbs I threw you.
What is the problem, Duck? The accumulated yellow fat
in your quacking-duck ass slowing you down today? But,
hey, Goober, at least you got here to do your ever so
predictable quacking, right?
So eager for bread crumbs. So quacking duck. So Dockery.
(Look! No apostrophes again! Nice, eh, Goober?)

QUACK!!!

That time you were even slower, Goober. Forty minutes!
Must be more fat in your duck-ass than one can speculate.
Better luck with your next quacking at bread crumbs, OK?

So eager for bread crumbs. So quacking duck. So Dockery.

(No apostrophes again! Luckily for you, eh, Goober?)

[Barbara's Cat]

Post by Barbara's Cat

Post by Barbara's Cat

Post by Barbara's Cat

Post by Dennis M. Hammes

Post by Barbara's Cat
Very duckitarian of me, eh?

Silly. You could have had a V-8.

And a liverwurst sandwich
with a thick slice of onion
and some spicy brown mustard
on Wonder brand white bread.
And I will cut its crust off
to make bread crumbs for Duck.
It's the duckitarian thing to do--
without bread crumbs, he will die.

QUACK!

As expected, Goober comes waddling up on cue.
So predictable. So quacking duck. So Dockery.

QUACK!

As always, without fail, Goober quacks again!
So predictable. So quacking duck. So Dockery.

QUACK!

And again, compelled by instinct, Goober comes quacking.

So compelled. So enslaved. So quacking duck. So Dockery.

[Barbara's Cat]

Post by Barbara's Cat

Post by Barbara's Cat

Post by Barbara's Cat

Post by Barbara's Cat

Post by Dennis M. Hammes

Post by Barbara's Cat
Very duckitarian of me, eh?

Silly. You could have had a V-8.

And a liverwurst sandwich
with a thick slice of onion
and some spicy brown mustard
on Wonder brand white bread.
And I will cut its crust off
to make bread crumbs for Duck.
It's the duckitarian thing to do--
without bread crumbs, he will die.

QUACK!

As expected, Goober comes waddling up on cue.
So predictable. So quacking duck. So Dockery.

QUACK!

As always, without fail, Goober quacks again!
So predictable. So quacking duck. So Dockery.

QUACK!

And again, compelled by instinct, Goober comes quacking.
So compelled. So enslaved. So quacking duck. So Dockery.

QUACK!

So driven by his hunger for bread crumbs, throw them
and Goober will come ... quacking. He cannot resist.

So easily baited. So quacking duck. So Dockery.

[Barbara's Cat]

can't stop posting /about/ me

[Barbara's Cat]

Hey Drunkery -
Please keep your crossposted bullshit off of rec.arts.fine. Thank you.
Mardou

Since the post was /quack/ I posted it on the rec.arts.fine newsgroup,
Mardou... a discussion of "ME" and "my quacking" not being even close
to your topic catergory.
Thanks for the comments, and what passes for critique on Usenet, though.

<html><pre><tt>

Seen in all UseNet Post Offices

+---------------------+
| UNWANTED |
| ------------------- |
| by Anybody Anywhere |
| ------------------- |
| ___ |
| /_, \ |
| oo >) |
| C__/ / |
| UU\(__ |
| / (\ |
| |. ||\ |
| || ||| |
| Willy Duckery |
| ------------------- |
| aka: Stupid Goober, |
| Drunkery, Twitch, |
| The Dodgeweave Duck |
| ------------------- |
| NO REWARD |
| (no apparent worth) |
+---------------------+

</tt></pre></html>

[Dennis M. Hammes]

Post by Barbara's Cat

Hey Drunkery -
Please keep your crossposted bullshit off of rec.arts.fine. Thank you.
Mardou

Since the post was /quack/ I posted it on the rec.arts.fine newsgroup,
Mardou... a discussion of "ME" and "my quacking" not being even close
to your topic catergory.
Thanks for the comments, and what passes for critique on Usenet, though.

<html><pre><tt>
Seen in all UseNet Post Offices

...a primitive folk art display if ever there was one.

Post by Barbara's Cat
+---------------------+
| UNWANTED |
| ------------------- |
| by Anybody Anywhere |
| ------------------- |
| ___ |
| /_, \ |
| oo >) |
| C__/ / |
| UU\(__ |
| / (\ |
| |. ||\ |
| || ||| |
| Willy Duckery |
| ------------------- |
| aka: Stupid Goober, |
| Drunkery, Twitch, |
| The Dodgeweave Duck |
| ------------------- |
| NO REWARD |
| (no apparent worth) |
+---------------------+
</tt></pre></html>

What a brut...
(Say, are those teeth Zinjanthropus? If so, the crown of the
head's too high.)

[Barbara's Cat]

sure as hell looks fucked up
http://tinyurl.com/2qgw4b

[Meat Plow]

In alt.usenet.kooks on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:58:47 GMT, Aratzio

On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:43:18 +0000, in alt.usenet.kooks, Peter J Ross

In rec.arts.poems on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 06:45:18 -0800 (PST), Will
<some RoadRunner sporge, identifiable at a glance as not originating
from Google Groups, snipped>

Another post, supposedly from Dennis M Hammes - same email address /
and/ Google Groups profile, for Peter J Ross to have a look at, since
he thinks Google posts can't be forged.

Let's see if I can make it easier for you.
For now, instead of troubling your quacky little head about forgeries,
just try to find *any* message that was posted using Google Groups.

Note that he's now triumphantly referring to a list of 100,000+ posts
attributed to Dennis Hammes, who has never used Google Groups for
posting, as far as I know. It seems that this list proves that
Dreckery was right, apparently, as many would not agree.

Tell Dreckery has never won the CNotM, please please please.

Kook of the Month, January 2005
Clueless Newbie of the Month, March 2005
Golden Killfile (shared with Alex "Dink" Cain), January 2005
Unabomber Surprise
Richard M Nixon Memorial "Pathological Liar" Award
How about a Tar & Feathers, a Foam Duck or the Office of Village
Idiot? Even chuckles lysaght isn't quite as stupid and clueless as
this, and chuckles has won all of them.

I think he fits the Village Idiot like a glove.

Seconds?

[miguel]

Post by Meat Plow

In alt.usenet.kooks on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:58:47 GMT, Aratzio

On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:43:18 +0000, in alt.usenet.kooks, Peter J Ross

In rec.arts.poems on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 06:45:18 -0800 (PST), Will
<some RoadRunner sporge, identifiable at a glance as not originating
from Google Groups, snipped>

Another post, supposedly from Dennis M Hammes - same email address /
and/ Google Groups profile, for Peter J Ross to have a look at, since
he thinks Google posts can't be forged.

Let's see if I can make it easier for you.
For now, instead of troubling your quacky little head about forgeries,
just try to find *any* message that was posted using Google Groups.

Note that he's now triumphantly referring to a list of 100,000+ posts
attributed to Dennis Hammes, who has never used Google Groups for
posting, as far as I know. It seems that this list proves that
Dreckery was right, apparently, as many would not agree.

Tell Dreckery has never won the CNotM, please please please.

Kook of the Month, January 2005
Clueless Newbie of the Month, March 2005
Golden Killfile (shared with Alex "Dink" Cain), January 2005
Unabomber Surprise
Richard M Nixon Memorial "Pathological Liar" Award
How about a Tar & Feathers, a Foam Duck or the Office of Village
Idiot? Even chuckles lysaght isn't quite as stupid and clueless as
this, and chuckles has won all of them.

I think he fits the Village Idiot like a glove.
Seconds?

What a rush to seek kookologists at work!

[John "C"]

Post by miguel

Post by Meat Plow

In alt.usenet.kooks on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:58:47 GMT, Aratzio

On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:43:18 +0000, in alt.usenet.kooks, Peter J Ross

In rec.arts.poems on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 06:45:18 -0800 (PST), Will
<some RoadRunner sporge, identifiable at a glance as not

originating

Post by miguel

Post by Meat Plow

from Google Groups, snipped>

Another post, supposedly from Dennis M Hammes - same email address /
and/ Google Groups profile, for Peter J Ross to have a look at, since
he thinks Google posts can't be forged.

Let's see if I can make it easier for you.
For now, instead of troubling your quacky little head about forgeries,
just try to find *any* message that was posted using Google Groups.

Note that he's now triumphantly referring to a list of 100,000+ posts
attributed to Dennis Hammes, who has never used Google Groups for
posting, as far as I know. It seems that this list proves that
Dreckery was right, apparently, as many would not agree.

Tell Dreckery has never won the CNotM, please please please.

Kook of the Month, January 2005
Clueless Newbie of the Month, March 2005
Golden Killfile (shared with Alex "Dink" Cain), January 2005
Unabomber Surprise
Richard M Nixon Memorial "Pathological Liar" Award
How about a Tar & Feathers, a Foam Duck or the Office of Village
Idiot? Even chuckles lysaght isn't quite as stupid and clueless as
this, and chuckles has won all of them.

I think he fits the Village Idiot like a glove.
Seconds?

What a rush to seek kookologists at work!

Appears to some sort of "Mating-Dance", miguel.

John C.

[Peter J Ross]

In rec.arts.poems on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:40:26 -0500, Meat Plow

Post by Meat Plow

In alt.usenet.kooks on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:58:47 GMT, Aratzio

On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:43:18 +0000, in alt.usenet.kooks, Peter J Ross

In rec.arts.poems on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 06:45:18 -0800 (PST), Will
<some RoadRunner sporge, identifiable at a glance as not originating
from Google Groups, snipped>

Another post, supposedly from Dennis M Hammes - same email address /
and/ Google Groups profile, for Peter J Ross to have a look at, since
he thinks Google posts can't be forged.

Let's see if I can make it easier for you.
For now, instead of troubling your quacky little head about forgeries,
just try to find *any* message that was posted using Google Groups.

Note that he's now triumphantly referring to a list of 100,000+ posts
attributed to Dennis Hammes, who has never used Google Groups for
posting, as far as I know. It seems that this list proves that
Dreckery was right, apparently, as many would not agree.

Tell Dreckery has never won the CNotM, please please please.

Kook of the Month, January 2005
Clueless Newbie of the Month, March 2005
Golden Killfile (shared with Alex "Dink" Cain), January 2005
Unabomber Surprise
Richard M Nixon Memorial "Pathological Liar" Award
How about a Tar & Feathers, a Foam Duck or the Office of Village
Idiot? Even chuckles lysaght isn't quite as stupid and clueless as
this, and chuckles has won all of them.

I think he fits the Village Idiot like a glove.
Seconds?

Seconded. He's been one of RAP's village idiots since the day he first
appeared, about six years ago, and it's time he was recognised more
widely.

(Btw, I'm delighted to find that alt.duck.quack.quack.quack is a real
newsgroup.)

[miguel]

Post by Peter J Ross

Post by Meat Plow

<some RoadRunner sporge, identifiable at a glance as not originating
from Google Groups, snipped>

Another post, supposedly from Dennis M Hammes - same email address /
and/ Google Groups profile, for Peter J Ross to have a look at, since
he thinks Google posts can't be forged.

Let's see if I can make it easier for you.
For now, instead of troubling your quacky little head about forgeries,
just try to find *any* message that was posted using Google Groups.

Note that he's now triumphantly referring to a list of 100,000+ posts
attributed to Dennis Hammes, who has never used Google Groups for
posting, as far as I know. It seems that this list proves that
Dreckery was right, apparently, as many would not agree.

Tell Dreckery has never won the CNotM, please please please.

Kook of the Month, January 2005
Clueless Newbie of the Month, March 2005
Golden Killfile (shared with Alex "Dink" Cain), January 2005
Unabomber Surprise
Richard M Nixon Memorial "Pathological Liar" Award
How about a Tar & Feathers, a Foam Duck or the Office of Village
Idiot? Even chuckles lysaght isn't quite as stupid and clueless as
this, and chuckles has won all of them.

I think he fits the Village Idiot like a glove.
Seconds?

Seconded. He's been one of RAP's village idiots since the day he first
appeared, about six years ago, and it's time he was recognised more
widely.

Peter Pansy says jump, Meat Plow says how high. There's a surprise.

Post by Peter J Ross
(Btw, I'm delighted to find that alt.duck.quack.quack.quack is a real
newsgroup.)

You are easily delighted, evidently. I imagine that the excitement you
are feeling about getting Dockery some awards is like a million bumble
bees buzzing in your behind.

[Peter J Ross]

In rec.arts.poems on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:37:28 -0800, miguel

You are quackly quacked, apparently, quackly. I quack that the quack you
are quacking about quacking Dreckery some quacks is like a million
quackle bees quacking in your quack.

"The animals looked from miguel to Dreckery, and from Dreckery back to
miguel, but it was no longer possible to tell the difference."

Now thank me, miguel, for giving you a little of the attention you
crave from me, not merely once, but twice in a single week. Feel free
to celebrate this as "PJR Day" in future years. Erect a statue. Design
a flag. And, above all, continue attaching your quacks to everything I
post for as long as we both shall live. At some future date, I may
even reply to one of your quacks again: feel free to construct a
messianic religion around this vague prophecy.


miguel's Usenet Kook Awards:

Kook of the Month, March 2007
Palmjob Paddle, March 2007
George Pickett Memorial Trophy, March 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, March and April 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle (trained by Bookman)
Busted Urinal Award
Bolo Bullis Foam Duck
Emmett Gulley "Obsesso" Award
Tinfoil Sombrero

As it happens, I had little or nothing to do with these "victories".
Personally, I find miguel consistently boring, and I'd be unsurprised
if many people agreed, apparently.

[miguel]

Post by Peter J Ross

Post by miguel

Post by Peter J Ross

Post by Meat Plow

<some RoadRunner sporge, identifiable at a glance as not originating
from Google Groups, snipped>

Another post, supposedly from Dennis M Hammes - same email address /
and/ Google Groups profile, for Peter J Ross to have a look at, since
he thinks Google posts can't be forged.

Let's see if I can make it easier for you.
For now, instead of troubling your quacky little head about forgeries,
just try to find *any* message that was posted using Google Groups.

Note that he's now triumphantly referring to a list of 100,000+ posts
attributed to Dennis Hammes, who has never used Google Groups for
posting, as far as I know. It seems that this list proves that
Dreckery was right, apparently, as many would not agree.

Tell Dreckery has never won the CNotM, please please please.

Kook of the Month, January 2005
Clueless Newbie of the Month, March 2005
Golden Killfile (shared with Alex "Dink" Cain), January 2005
Unabomber Surprise
Richard M Nixon Memorial "Pathological Liar" Award
How about a Tar & Feathers, a Foam Duck or the Office of Village
Idiot? Even chuckles lysaght isn't quite as stupid and clueless as
this, and chuckles has won all of them.

I think he fits the Village Idiot like a glove.
Seconds?

Seconded. He's been one of RAP's village idiots since the day he first
appeared, about six years ago, and it's time he was recognised more
widely.

Peter Pansy says jump, Meat Plow says how high. There's a surprise.

Post by Peter J Ross
(Btw, I'm delighted to find that alt.duck.quack.quack.quack is a real
newsgroup.)

You are easily delighted, evidently. I imagine that the excitement you
are feeling about getting Dockery some awards is like a million bumble
bees buzzing in your behind.

"The animals looked from miguel to Dreckery, and from Dreckery back to
miguel, but it was no longer possible to tell the difference."

Yet somehow you're outside the loop. Isn't that interesting. You must
truly pwn everybody! How impressive, especially when it's you who
started the obsessive jihad!

Post by Peter J Ross
Now thank me, miguel, for giving you a little of the attention you
crave from me, not merely once, but twice in a single week. Feel free
to celebrate this as "PJR Day" in future years. Erect a statue. Design
a flag. And, above all, continue attaching your quacks to everything I
post for as long as we both shall live. At some future date, I may
even reply to one of your quacks again: feel free to construct a
messianic religion around this vague prophecy.

Thanks, Pansy.

Post by Peter J Ross
Kook of the Month, March 2007
Palmjob Paddle, March 2007
George Pickett Memorial Trophy, March 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, March and April 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle (trained by Bookman)
Busted Urinal Award
Bolo Bullis Foam Duck
Emmett Gulley "Obsesso" Award
Tinfoil Sombrero

Oh no, not the AUK Kook awards, wherein 15-20 of your fellow
emotionally wounded circle-jerkers gather each month to celebrate
their sense of superior circle-jerking over the past 30 days and then
act like this is somehow the consensus of the entire Usenet?

These awards meant something back when there was a real vote wrangler
-- Tim Skirvin. After you took over, and then Vince from you, they
became sillier and sillier. We need a real vote wrangler again. Bring
back Tim Skirvin!

Post by Peter J Ross
As it happens, I had little or nothing to do with these "victories".
Personally, I find miguel consistently boring, and I'd be unsurprised
if many people agreed, apparently.

It's interesting that you should say that. I don't see a lot of people
jumping on your petty jihad against Dockery, except the usual fool
suspects in AUK. Does that not reflect properly upon the level of
interest your childish little obsession against Dockery inspires?

[John "C"]

Post by miguel
Oh no, not the AUK Kook awards, wherein 15-20 of your fellow
emotionally wounded circle-jerkers gather each month to celebrate
their sense of superior circle-jerking over the past 30 days and then
act like this is somehow the consensus of the entire Usenet?

LOL !

Number One

[Dennis M. Hammes]

Post by miguel
I don't see a lot of people
jumping on your petty jihad against Dockery, except the usual fool
suspects in AUK.

Try to have your quacking make sense.

[Meat Plow]

Post by Dennis M. Hammes

Post by miguel
I don't see a lot of people
jumping on your petty jihad against Dockery, except the usual fool
suspects in AUK.

Try to have your quacking make sense.

HAR! If that would ever be a possibility :)

[Meat Plow]

Post by Peter J Ross
In rec.arts.poems on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:37:28 -0800, miguel

You are quackly quacked, apparently, quackly. I quack that the quack you
are quacking about quacking Dreckery some quacks is like a million
quackle bees quacking in your quack.

"The animals looked from miguel to Dreckery, and from Dreckery back to
miguel, but it was no longer possible to tell the difference."
Now thank me, miguel, for giving you a little of the attention you
crave from me, not merely once, but twice in a single week. Feel free
to celebrate this as "PJR Day" in future years. Erect a statue. Design
a flag. And, above all, continue attaching your quacks to everything I
post for as long as we both shall live. At some future date, I may
even reply to one of your quacks again: feel free to construct a
messianic religion around this vague prophecy.
Kook of the Month, March 2007
Palmjob Paddle, March 2007
George Pickett Memorial Trophy, March 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, March and April 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle (trained by Bookman)
Busted Urinal Award
Bolo Bullis Foam Duck
Emmett Gulley "Obsesso" Award
Tinfoil Sombrero
As it happens, I had little or nothing to do with these "victories".
Personally, I find miguel consistently boring, and I'd be unsurprised
if many people agreed, apparently.

I don't think a whole lot of sane people read his drek.

[John "C"]

Post by Meat Plow

Post by Peter J Ross
In rec.arts.poems on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:37:28 -0800, miguel

You are quackly quacked, apparently, quackly. I quack that the quack you
are quacking about quacking Dreckery some quacks is like a million
quackle bees quacking in your quack.

"The animals looked from miguel to Dreckery, and from Dreckery back to
miguel, but it was no longer possible to tell the difference."
Now thank me, miguel, for giving you a little of the attention you
crave from me, not merely once, but twice in a single week. Feel free
to celebrate this as "PJR Day" in future years. Erect a statue. Design
a flag. And, above all, continue attaching your quacks to everything I
post for as long as we both shall live. At some future date, I may
even reply to one of your quacks again: feel free to construct a
messianic religion around this vague prophecy.
Kook of the Month, March 2007
Palmjob Paddle, March 2007
George Pickett Memorial Trophy, March 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, March and April 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle (trained by Bookman)
Busted Urinal Award
Bolo Bullis Foam Duck
Emmett Gulley "Obsesso" Award
Tinfoil Sombrero
As it happens, I had little or nothing to do with these "victories".
Personally, I find miguel consistently boring, and I'd be

unsurprised

Post by Meat Plow

Post by Peter J Ross
if many people agreed, apparently.

I don't think a whole lot of sane people read his drek.

Hi Fat Boi.

heh

[Dennis M. Hammes]

Post by miguel
You are easily delighted, evidently. I imagine that the excitement you
are feeling about getting Dockery some awards is like a million bumble
bees buzzing in your behind.

A feeling you know well, evidently ,?
Puppet...

[Meat Plow]

Post by Peter J Ross
In rec.arts.poems on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:40:26 -0500, Meat Plow

Post by Meat Plow

In alt.usenet.kooks on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:58:47 GMT, Aratzio

On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:43:18 +0000, in alt.usenet.kooks, Peter J Ross

In rec.arts.poems on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 06:45:18 -0800 (PST), Will
<some RoadRunner sporge, identifiable at a glance as not originating
from Google Groups, snipped>

Another post, supposedly from Dennis M Hammes - same email address /
and/ Google Groups profile, for Peter J Ross to have a look at, since
he thinks Google posts can't be forged.

Let's see if I can make it easier for you.
For now, instead of troubling your quacky little head about forgeries,
just try to find *any* message that was posted using Google Groups.

Note that he's now triumphantly referring to a list of 100,000+ posts
attributed to Dennis Hammes, who has never used Google Groups for
posting, as far as I know. It seems that this list proves that
Dreckery was right, apparently, as many would not agree.

Tell Dreckery has never won the CNotM, please please please.

Kook of the Month, January 2005
Clueless Newbie of the Month, March 2005
Golden Killfile (shared with Alex "Dink" Cain), January 2005
Unabomber Surprise
Richard M Nixon Memorial "Pathological Liar" Award
How about a Tar & Feathers, a Foam Duck or the Office of Village
Idiot? Even chuckles lysaght isn't quite as stupid and clueless as
this, and chuckles has won all of them.

I think he fits the Village Idiot like a glove.
Seconds?

Seconded. He's been one of RAP's village idiots since the day he first
appeared, about six years ago, and it's time he was recognised more
widely.
(Btw, I'm delighted to find that alt.duck.quack.quack.quack is a real
newsgroup.)

There are also alt.duck.quack, *quack.quack, and of course
*quack.quack,quack :)

[John "C"]

Post by Meat Plow

Post by Peter J Ross
In rec.arts.poems on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:40:26 -0500, Meat Plow

Post by Meat Plow

In alt.usenet.kooks on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:58:47 GMT, Aratzio

On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:43:18 +0000, in alt.usenet.kooks, Peter J Ross

In rec.arts.poems on Wed, 27 Feb 2008 06:45:18 -0800 (PST), Will
<some RoadRunner sporge, identifiable at a glance as not

originating

Post by Meat Plow

Post by Peter J Ross

Post by Meat Plow

from Google Groups, snipped>

Another post, supposedly from Dennis M Hammes - same email address /
and/ Google Groups profile, for Peter J Ross to have a look at, since
he thinks Google posts can't be forged.

Let's see if I can make it easier for you.
For now, instead of troubling your quacky little head about forgeries,
just try to find *any* message that was posted using Google Groups.

Note that he's now triumphantly referring to a list of 100,000+ posts
attributed to Dennis Hammes, who has never used Google Groups for
posting, as far as I know. It seems that this list proves that
Dreckery was right, apparently, as many would not agree.

Tell Dreckery has never won the CNotM, please please please.

Kook of the Month, January 2005
Clueless Newbie of the Month, March 2005
Golden Killfile (shared with Alex "Dink" Cain), January 2005
Unabomber Surprise
Richard M Nixon Memorial "Pathological Liar" Award
How about a Tar & Feathers, a Foam Duck or the Office of Village
Idiot? Even chuckles lysaght isn't quite as stupid and clueless as
this, and chuckles has won all of them.

I think he fits the Village Idiot like a glove.
Seconds?

Seconded. He's been one of RAP's village idiots since the day he first
appeared, about six years ago, and it's time he was recognised more
widely.
(Btw, I'm delighted to find that alt.duck.quack.quack.quack is a real
newsgroup.)

There are also alt.duck.quack, *quack.quack, and of course
*quack.quack,quack :)

Hi, Fat Boi.

heh

[Meat Plow]

Maybe if he cuts

I ''cut'

Pizza.

meheh heh heh

[Meat Plow]

PJR
Michael Cook

Why are you

Why are you

Why are you

[Barbara's Cat]

to be so. The one party can do miracles, not the others. For it is clear
of the one party that they are opposed to the truth, but not of the others;
and thus miracles are clearer.

Hmmm... gotta admit, the forger took the time to get the Hammish ''Try
to have your writing not make sense'' rule down. This could easily be
mistaken for an authentic Hammes post.

It's an extract from a translation of Pascal

I'm not really that interested in all the details of how the forgery was
created, but more the fact that the forgery /was/ created, using Hammes'
exact email address, and archived on Google Groups as /by/ ''Dennis
Hammes''.

No matter what, remain belligerently clueless, eh, Goober?

[Barbara's Cat]

Post by Barbara's Cat

to be so. The one party can do miracles, not the others. For it is clear
of the one party that they are opposed to the truth, but not of the others;
and thus miracles are clearer.

Hmmm... gotta admit, the forger took the time to get the Hammish ''Try
to have your writing not make sense'' rule down. This could easily be
mistaken for an authentic Hammes post.

It's an extract from a translation of Pascal

I'm not really that interested in all the details of how the forgery was
created, but more the fact that the forgery /was/ created, using Hammes'
exact email address, and archived on Google Groups as /by/ ''Dennis
Hammes''.

No matter what, remain belligerently clueless, eh, Goober?

The fact remains that forgery did happen, as described above.

No matter what; to your very last dying breathless quack.
--
Cm~

"Many men can out drink me,
out fuck me... out think me,
but they'll never beat me
at *my* game."
- Will Dockery,
proclaiming to be
good at something